The same performance is observed in Maya!
#Fp64 titan drivers#
What's wrong with 3DS Max? Can't Autodesk make some competent plug-ins to properly utilize NVIDIA drivers for Quadro? This is not even FP64 matter, as these new Quadro cards have poor FP64 performance relative to Kepler architecture Quadro cards, it is just about optimization for FP32.
of FP64 operation on the Titan RTX GPU (with 130 TFlops on Tensor Cores). Take a look at this:īenchmark made by techgage shows that a general purpose card like GTX 1080 Ti actually beats Quadro P6000, which is pathetic, because in Solidworks GTX 1080 Ti gets beaten hard by low end Quadro P2000. matrix multiplication on FP64 (DGEMM) and FP32 (SGEMM) using Tensor Cores.
Next thing is optimization for current generation of professional graphic cards. Considering the configuration of a node that contains one next-generation AMD 'Milan' 64 core CPU, and four of NVIDIA's 'Ampere. With a total of 8 PetaFLOPs planned to be achieved by the Big Red 200, that leaves just a bit under 5 PetaFLOPs to be had using GPU+CPU enabled system. I always thought that Max and Maya have FP64 support since like 2008, but i guess i was wrong? The internet is DEAD if you search for this matter, as if no one cares. These CPUs provide 3.15 PetaFLOPs of combined FP64 performance.
#Fp64 titan full#
NVIDIA deliberately chose not to enable this by default and instead let you control the behavior by setting FP64 at full speed (1/3 FP32) or reduced speed (1/24 FP32). I am not sure how many people would find FP64 useful. Titan cards by default have the FP64 implementation 'capped', that has been done mainly due to power efficiency reasons and clockspeed. If there would be FP64 support, many people would 'refind' their old FP64 monster graphic cards like GTX Titan Black or Radeon R9 295X2 for a ''new life''. The point is that mainstream graphics cards are still better than professional graphics cards in these programs. Which means in an ideal case, running the same code by only changing float types to double types, would yield the single precision run time to be about 1/24th of the double precision time (time (FP32) time (FP64)/24). Correct me if i am wrong, but that is not the point anyway. Double precision FP64 option Missing on Titan Discussion in ' Videocards - NVIDIA GeForce Drivers Section ' started by GamingArena . For example, on a GTX 780 Ti, the FP64 performance is 1/24 FP32.
#Fp64 titan 64 Bit#
Greetings! I am not a user of any Autodesk program whatsoever, but being a long time bench-marker of various PC stuff i am curious to know does 3DS Max or Maya for that matter use 64 bit floating point numbers in any of their object/polygon editing vertices, shaders, light or any of that stuff? It is my understanding that 32 bit floating point precision is enough to divide an object into 1x 1023 vertices and 64 bit floating point precision would be enough for 1x 1052 vertices on a plane. G80 (RG3) trail blazer i 30 Sorrento S7 6 series Tiguan Xts Ex35 Titan G-class captiva Rio Kicks A4 Rdx Durango C30 Mazda3 5-door Sierra 2500hd A5 sportback.
0 kommentar(er)
